Below is the latest news from the friendsEXTRADITED twitter and also public tweets on extradition.
Dave McIntyre was extradited on 3 July 2014 to the US pending trial
Dave McIntyre was extradited on 3 July 2014 to the US pending trial.
He is currently in custody in a jail in Washington DC. He is on 23 hour a day lock down. He has only been able to make one phone call to his worried family in the UK in 10 days. This is the way innocent people are treated just because their trial is not taking place in the UK. What happened to innocence before proven guilty? Why is it necessary to keep Dave locked up for 23 hours a day?
The extradition law is a disgrace and needs urgent amendment - if you are as concerned as we are, please write to your MP citing the cases mentioned on this website.
ECtHR DISMISSES DUNHAMS' APPEAL AGAINST US EXTRADITION
- Dunhams Rule 39 Application to European Court of Human Rights is dismissed
- They have now exhausted all avenues of appeal
- Will be extradited to US within 28 days - awaiting notification of date from Home Office
- Paul Dunham (58) accused of overclaiming expenses from a US company PACE Inc of which Paul was Chief Executive/President and a 20% shareholder
- Sandra Dunham (57) is accused of aiding and abetting her husband
- Dunhams vehemently contend expenses were wholly legitimate business expenses incurred in the course of their employment, agreed to by then Chairman and signed off by the finance director and company auditors
- Dunhams ask why they would rip-off a company in which they were significant shareholders
Last night the European Court faxed confirmation to Kaim Todner, the Dunhams' solicitors, that the Acting President of the Section of the Court has decided not to indicate to the Government of the United Kingdom that they should not extradite the Dunhams, following their Rule 39 Application.
This means that the Government of the United Kingdom from today can arrange for the Dunhams' imminent extradition to the United States of America, which must take place within 28 days.
Paul Dunham says:
Sandra and I are simply devastated. In fact we're disgusted. The High Court recently ruled that an alleged terrorist will not be extradited to America without specific assurances as to his medical treatment. Yet Sandra and I, both honest, hardworking British tax-payers all our lives, now suffering from acute mental health problems, are being parcelled off without a thought for our welfare. We are heartbroken at being forced to leave behind my aged father, our son, our beloved 5 grandchildren and our cherished two dogs. We are innocent of any wrongdoing but no British court will hear our evidence.
We're both approaching 60 and our future is separation from each other, locked up a truly grim former Supermax prison, for an undisclosed period of pre-trial detention. We don't have money to secure bail. This is before any court has examined our defence. How did Britain become so unjust?
Michael Evans, of Kaim Todner Ltd, the Dunhams' solicitor, says:
The treatment being meted out to the Dunhams is brutal - whilst politicians of all seniority and political persuasion wring their hands saying there's nothing they can do to stop the bulldozer that is US extradition. It's a sad day for justice.
BBC Radio Northampton interview with Friends Extradited
(1hr 40 mins in) on Paul and Sandra Dunham's extradition. Click here for video.
Monday 20 Jan 2014
Monday 20 Jan 2014: The Lords debated the Government's latest attempts to worsen the extradition protections for British citizens by doing away with the automatic right of appeal as part of the Anti Social Behaviour Crime & Policing Bill.
Please read Fair Trials International's briefing on the subject to get up to speed with the issues.
Monday 14 Oct 2013: Anti-social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Bill Report Stage, Please Support Extradition Amendments
Since the introduction of the fast-track extradition system via the Extradition Act 2003, many of your constituents will either have been personally affected or have known someone who has been affected. Judging by the levels of support shown on various (e)petitions / marches / demonstrations and in media comment, your constituents may repeatedly have made their concerns clear to Parliament in the 9 years since the law and treaties were enacted and ratified.
Campaigners of all political hues remain disappointed that two serious flaws continue to exist within the UK's current legislation, despite repeated calls for amendment, most notably:
- no requirement for proper judicial scrutiny of the correct "forum" for prosecution
- no prima facie evidential requirement before extradition.
You now have an opportunity to address these flaws – and we urge you to act.
Please support the safeguard amendments, tabled today by Dominic Raab and Nick de Bois, at Monday's Report stage of the Anti-social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Bill (14 Oct). The aim is to provide proper safeguards for British citizens to prevent injustice under the European Arrest Warrant and the UK-US treaty. The amendments strengthen UK safeguards without requiring amendment of the EU Framework Decision or UK-US treaty.
Every week that goes by, yet more unwarranted extradition requests are made of the UK. It's time to stop unnecessarily outsourcing our criminal justice system.
Please contact us if you would like a further briefing on extradition matters, or on the history of the extradition controversy since 2004.
We thank you for doing your bit to prevent the cruelty of unnecessary extradition.
LEGAL FIRST HALTS DAVID MCINTYRE US EXTRADITION
- Lawyers cite exceptional circumstances warranting new appeal
- Appeal to be submitted under new amendments to Extradition Act 2003
London: Kaim Todner solicitors, representing David McIntyre, have today successfully halted Mr McIntyres extradition pending a fresh appeal to the High Court. The new appeal, the first of its kind in England, is permissible under the amendments to the Extradition Act 2003 inserted in the Crime & Courts Act 2013, which received Royal Assent on 25 April 2013.
McIntyre (42) is a British Army reservist whose extradition is sought by the US on allegations of overcharging the US Institute of Peace (USIP) for a security contract in Iraq by £65,000. He strenuously denies any wrongdoing.
Permission for a new appeal, after the Home Secretary has already considered and rejected submissions on Mr McIntyres behalf, can only be granted on human rights grounds under the new legislation where:
- the appeal is necessary to avoid real injustice; and
- the circumstances are exceptional and make it appropriate to consider the appeal.
According to Mike Evans, McIntyres solicitor at Kaim Todner, it would be a real injustice for McIntyre to be extradited with his high risk of suicide and untreated PTSD, given the issue was not raised by the former solicitor nor addressed before any UK Court by a specialist expert with relevant experience of PTSD and suicide risk in respect of Army personnel. Compelling evidence of Mr McIntyres mental health illness is now available and therefore circumstances are exceptional, making it appropriate for the High Court to consider the appeal.
No hearing date for this appeal has yet been set by the High Court. It is unlikely to be heard before end of October 2013.
Mike Evans of Kaim Todner, comments:
I have seen stark and compelling evidence from the British Armys only consultant forensic psychiatrist Colonel McAllister. He has specialist knowledge in the diagnosis and treatment of mental disorder and is currently treating Dave. The Colonel has expressed grave reservations regarding Daves extradition, foreseeing likely fatal consequences were steps taken to extradite him before his UK treatment is completed. Dave has spent most of his life serving in dangerous regions in interests of his country. He is vehement in his denials of the allegations which stem from the testimony of an individual seeking to secure a plea agreement with the US. I remain hopeful that the High Court will respect Daves right to life, protect him from inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, and recognise his right to a private and family life, by rejecting his extradition. This would pave the way for a domestic investigation and prosecution if theres sufficient evidence to warrant one.
Details of Daves case can be found on http://www.friends-extradited.org/citizens/david_mcintyre
Emergency Motion at the Liberty AGM
May 2013 - Melanie Riley introduced the following Emergency Motion at the Liberty AGM which was unanimously supported by the attendant members:
Emergency Motion on Extradition Reform
This AGM notes recent and proposed Government amendments to the Extradition Act 2003.
This AGM notes that while an efficient extradition system is clearly in the public interest, extradition is a trauma in itself and basic procedural safeguards are essential to prevent injustice.
This AGM notes Libertys long held concerns over the UKs extradition framework which is blunt and arbitrary. In particular, that -
- Those resident in the UK can be extradited to foreign jurisdictions without a basic case first being made in a UK court;
- British judges have been unable to bar extradition on the grounds of forum where alleged activity has taken place in whole, or in substantial part, in the UK.
This AGM notes with concern Government amendments included in the Crime and Courts Act 2013 which removed the Home Secretarys obligation to bar extradition where it would breach human rights after legal appeals have been exhausted; and introduced only minimal judicial discretion to bar extradition on forum grounds.
This AGM notes with further concern, clauses in the Anti-Social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Bill that would remove appeal rights in extradition cases.
This AGM therefore resolves that Liberty will continue to campaign for extradition reform and fight the further erosion of fundamental protections in this area.
Response to draft forum amendments
Friends Extradited response to draft forum amendments:
We are extremely disappointed by the draft forum amendments. As well as being unduly complicated, they demonstrate scant regard for the basic rights of defendants. They are effectively a carte blanche for prosecutors to continue to make the kinds of behind closed doors decisions that have been the root cause of so many of the problems over the past 9 years. This draft fails on all key criteria - justice must not only be done but be seen to be done, by the British courts, in a transparent manner. The more draconian an impact on a defendant, the greater the need for effective safeguards against injustice. As currently drafted, not one of the recent high-profile US extradition cases would have been prevented by these amendments. The Government needs to think again. The forum clause needs to be simple, and with a clear presumption in favour of UK proceedings where a case could be heard in this country.
FAIR TRIALS EXPRESSES DELIGHT AT HOME SECRETARYS ANNOUNCEMENT ON EXTRADITION ARRANGEMENTS
The Home Secretary has today announced important changes to the way extradition decisions are taken in the UK. A new power for courts hearing extradition cases will be introduced, giving them the power to say no where the UK is a more appropriate forum for the case to be heard and it is in the interests of justice, therefore, not to extradite the person for trial overseas. The Government has also recognised the need to reform our extradition arrangements with the rest of Europe, responsible for the vast majority of extraditions from the UK.
Fair Trials Internationals Chief Executive, Jago Russell, said:
The Governments statement today goes much further than the case of Gary McKinnon, promising long-awaited reforms to put justice and fairness back into our extradition laws. We welcome the fact that our courts will be given the power to refuse extradition when the country seeking it is clearly the wrong place to hear the case. We are also delighted that the Government has recognised the need to work with the rest of Europe to improve the European Arrest Warrant, responsible for the vast majority of extraditions from the UK and most of the cases of injustice.
Fair Trials International has long called for reforms to our extradition arrangements, including allowing courts to refuse extradition in cases where there is a genuine issue over where the trial should take place and where it is more appropriate to bring a prosecution in the UK. We have also identified key changes that can and should be made to our Extradition Act, including reforms to how our courts deal with European Arrest Warrant cases. These changes can be enacted now and do not need to wait until 2014, when the UK has the right to opt out of this and other EU justice measures.
For more information please contact Fair Trials International on +44 (0)20 7822 2370 or +44 (0)7950 849 851
Gary McKinnon Annoucement
Melanie Riley of Friends Extradited says:
We are relieved and delighted for Gary and his family and his lawyers. A brave and correct decision has finally been made by the Home Secretary.
In addition, at last, the principle for which we campaigners have fought so hard looks like it will become enshrined in British law. However the devil will be in the detail ie the wording of the forum bar to extradition. We will not rest until we achieve a presumption in favour of British trials for British citizens, for conduct committed on British soil.
Our thoughts today are with all those friends unnecessarily extradited before the wrongs of the Extradition Act 2003 are put right. It is each of their efforts in highlighting the obvious flaws in the legislation that have led to todays announcement. Many of them are being held in the US right now: out of sight but, to us, definitely not out of mind.
FRIENDS EXTRADITED CALLS FOR THE HOME SECRETARY TO TAKE IMMEDIATE ACTION ON EXTRADITION
10 years after Gary McKinnons ordeal began, next week Theresa May must finally release him from his US extradition nightmare.
To restore public confidence in Britains discriminate extradition regime, the Home Secretary should take immediate steps to introduce legislation to Parliament to incorporate proper consideration by British courts of the correct jurisdiction for trial the so called forum test. A forum test would have prevented years of anguish for Gary and his family, whilst also preventing years of legal wrangling and trial delays affecting countless other British citizens, whose conduct took place in the UK, who nonetheless have been extradited, or continue to fight extradition, to the US.
Ours is an obviously flawed extradition law yet the solution is simple.
Heres one reason, for every year of Garys turmoil, for the introduction of the forum test:
- Because the starting principle should be that British citizens, accused of crimes committed while they were physically on British soil, have a right to defend themselves in Britain
- Because Parliament agreed to the inclusion of a forum test in 2006 - but successive governments have so far failed to enact it
- Because every senior member of the current Cabinet who was in Parliament in 2006 voted in favour of it
- Because in June last year the Joint Committee on Human Rights called for it
- Because in November last year approx. 150,000 people signed an e-petition supporting it
- Because in December last year a unanimously-carried Commons Motion called for it
- Because in March this year the Home Affairs Select Committee called for it
- Because 83% of MPs privately polled by Liberty supported it
- Because the European Convention on Extradition, to which the UK is a signatory, specifically contemplates it
- Because almost every other country in the world already operates a forum test in their extradition arrangements
Mrs May time to act?
Melanie Riley of campaign group Friends-Extradited said:
The strength of feeling on this issue is overwhelming. Britain was sold a pup in 2003 its time for this Government to right the wrongs. Garys 10 years spent living on a knife-edge has been nothing short of cruel and unnecessary punishment. The impact of extradition on the defendant, their friends and families is so severe that extradition should be the last, not first, resort in Britains efforts to fight crime. After years of campaigning, it seems a shift in mindset over this simple principle is required by the Home Office and the CPS. Extradition should not be determined on the mercy of the sitting Home Secretary or through horse-trading between US & UK prosecutors behind closed doors - this leads to delayed, arbitrary and, above all, populist not principled decision-making. Instead, there should be a swift and transparent examination of all matters affecting jurisdiction, determined by a judge in a British court, before any extradition of any British citizen is granted. Lets hope next week heralds new and enlightened thinking from the Home Office.
An example of a strange judicial decision in US over extradition
Read this example of a strange judicial decision in US over extradition
Babar Ahmad and Talha Ahsan Extradited
Babar Ahmad and Talha Ahsan were extradited to the US on Friday 5 October 2012.
Businessman Karl Watkin has launched a private prosecution of Babar Ahmad and Talha Ahsan
Show the DPP that there is public interest in the principle of British justice for British citizens for conduct in Britain. Write a brief email to email@example.com to register your support for Mr Watkins initiative.
For details, read here:http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-19503504
And to see what others think about the importance of this principle, read here:http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/sep/11/babar-ahmad-outsource-criminal-justice
"Extradite Me, I'm British" a Cultural Event on US-UK Extradition laws - Saturday 8th Sept
"Extradite Me, I'm British" a Cultural Event on US-UK Extradition laws on Saturday 8th September in London (tickets can be purchased for £5 in advance). Includes screening of Extradition film plus comedian and actor Jeff Mirza will be reading Talha's comic love sonnet to Theresa May; other speakers will include awarding winning novelist A.L Kennedy; David Bermingham (one of the Natwest Three), former Guantanamo detainee Moazzam Begg, journalist Victoria Brittain and comedian Ahir Shah, fresh from the Edinburgh Festival.
All welcome to attend.
The programme of film, prison poetry, talks, drama, comedy and nasheeds explores questions at the at the heart of British identity: what it means to be a British citizen, the erosion of civil liberties, human rights in a post-9/11 era, British Sovereignty and its big brother relations with America.
"Extradite Me, I'm British" will be held on 8th September, 7pm - 11pm at Rich Mix, London, 35 - 47 Bethnal Green Road, London, E1 6LA. Tickets (£5) are available at http://www.richmix.org.uk/whats-on/event/extradite-me-im-british/
EXTRADITION: DOCU-FILM RELEASE, PARLIAMENTARY MEETING & DOWNING STREET PROTEST
Marking the debut release of a powerful docu-film Extradition (see below) which charts the fight against the extradition to the US of British men Babar Ahmad and Talha Ahsan, internationally-renowned US linguistic Professor and philosopher, Noam Chomsky, has issued a statement of support:
With the sharp deterioration of protection of elementary civil rights in the US, no one should be extradited to the country on charges related to alleged terrorism. The constitutional lawyer in the White House, after all, has just made it clear that the due process provisions of the US Constitution (and Magna Carta) can be satisfied by an internal discussion in the executive branch. And that is hardly the only example. Furthermore, the prisons and the incarceration system in general are an international scandal. The shallow and evasive charges in this case strongly reinforce that conclusion. I wish you the best success in your campaign to block extradition for Talha Ahsan.http://freetalha.org/2012/06/statement-of-support-noam-chomsky/
EXTRADITION directed by Turab Shah.
The London premier of this short docu-film takes place at 7pm on Friday 22 June at Hend House, 233 Shaftsbury Avenue, London WC2H 8EE. All are welcome to attend.
The film features interviews with Gareth Peirce, Talhas Brother Hamja Ahsan, playwright Avaes Mohammad, the fathers of both Babar and Talha and is framed by Talhas prison poetry. All contributors to the film are anticipating attending the London screening.
Further details: http://freetalha.org/2012/06/uk-tour-of-powerful-documentary-extradition/ #extradition
House of Commons Meeting - Wednesday 20th June 2012 (6-8pm).
John Hemming MP invites you to join the families and friends of Babar Ahmad, Talha Ahsan, Gary McKinnon and Richard ODwyer in calling for a halt to their extradition to the United States. Speakers include: John Hemming MP, Ashfaq Ahmad, Caroline Lucas MP, Sadiq Khan MP, Gareth Peirce, David Bermingham, Victoria Brittain, Sir Iqbal Sacranie
Committee Room 10, House of Commons
On Wednesday 20th June 2012, 6pm 8 pm
Further Details: http://wearebabarahmad.org/. #freebabar #freetalha #RichardO #freegary
Downing Street Protest Saturday 23 June 2012 (1-3pm).
All welcome to attend the National Day of Protest Against Extradition of Talha Ahsan, Babar Ahmad, Gary Mckinnon and Richard O Dwyer in London outside Downing Street between 1pm - 3pm.
23 May 2012 at 6.30pm - Meeting to highlight extradition injustice: ALL WELCOME
Please come and support the struggle against extradition of the families of Talha Ahsan, Gary McKinnon, Richard O'Dwyer and Babar Ahmad.
Venue: Hend House, 233 Shaftesbury Avenue London
(nearest tube Tottenham Court Road).
Bruce Kent, Political Activist,
Gareth Peirce, Lawyer
Salma Yacoob, Respect Party
Victoria Brittain, Former Associate Editor, Guardian
Sheffield Hallam University student wins prize for extradition poster at prestigious girl geek event
Sarah Murfet a first year Sheffield Hallam University Student has won the award for the People's Choice at the Lovelace Colloqium (Girl Geeks). Above is Sarah's winning entry which provides summary of Richard's, Chris Tappin & Gary Mckinnons extradition battles.
A fantastic honour for Sarah to win at this event which was attended by reps from Google, Thoughtworks & Bloomberg and many thanks to Sarah both for creating this poster on such an important subject and also for letting us use her poster in our campaigns against this extradition injustice. Sarah's blog
10 April 2012 ECHR ruled Babar Ahmads extradition to a SuperMax prison would not be inhumane
The European Court handed down its ruling. In response, Babars lawyer said:
The European Court has decided, in large part on the basis of disputed statistics provided by the UK Government to which the Applicants were not permitted to respond, that isolation in a US Supermax prison is relative and will become a violation of Article 3 ECHR which prohibits torture, only if it extends indefinitely.
It will come as a considerable surprise to the inmates of ADX Florence, the prison in question, and their lawyers who struggle fruitlessly to challenge in the US courts their continuing solitary confinement for 8, 10, or 16 years, that the prisoners grim isolation could be considered only relative and its continuance as justiciable. It will be equally surprising to international lawyers, who may include the UN Special Rapporteur on Torture and the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture, that the view of the European Court as to what constitutes isolation is apparently in conflict with their own.
The Courts judgment however does not address at all the burning issue in these cases, and one that has been the focus of intense debate in the UK for the past 6 years, namely why in all logic, fairness, and practical common sense are not British citizens (whose UK actions are forming the basis of prosecution in the US, and where all of the evidence on which they are being tried was accumulated in its entirety in the UK by UK police and shipped lock stock and barrel to US prosecutors), being tried in their own country?
Every aspect of the 4 years of proceedings in the European Court would have been avoided had straightforward early steps been initiated to prosecute in the UK . The notion of the appropriate forum for trial and punishment being the accused persons own country is the subject matter of automatic guarantees in many countries which refuse to extradite their own nationals but instead, guarantee that if extradition is sought by a foreign requesting state, that it will prosecute its own national instead. Or - the case in Holland and Israel - they will extradite their own nationals but only if there is an unshakeable guarantee by the requesting state that they would be returned if they are convicted, to serve their sentences in their country of origin.
That extradition, an important measure practised between states, must be respected, is a phrase frequently applied in the courts. What is important to point out is that the respect due to extradition stems not so much from respect for diplomatic relationships between states, but so that perpetrators of crime will not go unpunished. In each of the cases decided by the European Court today what has been emphasised by the Appellants throughout is not that any accused should avoid justice, but that they should be tried and if appropriate convicted in the country in which the claimed evidence was found, in which the relevant witnesses are present (both for the prosecution and the defence) and in which none of the serious issues raised in the European Courts extended proceedings would have arisen.
Birnberg Peirce and Partners
10th April 2012
Event Announcement: Extradition Watch - Richard's Story
Join Director Shami Chakrabarti and other
guest speakers, including Julia ODwyer,
mother of Sheffield Hallam University student
Richard ODwyer at Libertys Extradition
Watch event on Thursday 29th March from
6.30pm to 8pm.
Read more: Extradition Watch Richard's Story (PDF format).
The Guardians poll on extradition
The Guardians poll on extradition 7 years of campaigning have at least got the message out ..
now its for the politicians to act on that message:
View the poll results: http://www.guardian.co.uk/law/poll/2012/mar/01/extradition.
(05/03/2012) Christopher Tappin has been denied bail in US. US prosecutors claimed the 65-year-old grandfather would be a "danger to the community" if released.
(29/02/2012) Christopher Tappin has arrived in US jail and is in solitary confinement 23 hours a day with no reading materials.
Christopher Tappin to be extradited Friday 24 February 2012. The UK Government should be ashamed that the extradition law is still not changed.
On Monday 13 February 2012, the European Court ruled that it would not order a stay on Christopher Tappin's extradition to the US. Mr Tappin now expects to learn his date for extradition from the Home Office by Monday 20 February and expects to receive 7 days notice of his extradition.
Janis Sharp delivers Number 10 to Number 10 Downing Street.
On Friday 13 January the District Judge Purdy in Westminster Magistrates Court ruled that Richard O'Dwyer should be extradited to America on charges of copyright infringement. Richard awaits the Home Secretary's final order before launching his appeal to the High Court. Meantime, the decision has provoked visceral reaction from IT specialists, website operators, lawyers and swathes of ordinary members of the public. It has even attracted the attention of campaigners in the US - see attached video, particularly the first 3 minutes and the last minute.
Westminster Hall Debate
On Thursday 24th November Backbench MPs held a debate in Westminster Hall on the matter of extradition. Listening to the vehemence and eloquence of the arguments during 3 hour debate was extremely gratifying for those of us who have sought to highlight the flaws in our extradition laws since 2005.
The result was consensus for the need to achieve time for a full debate on the matter in the Main Chamber of the House of Commons.
You can read Hansards report of the whole debate here.
As a result there is now the following motion in the Main Chamber of the House on 5th December:
That this House calls upon the Government to reform the UKs extradition arrangements as a matter of urgency to strengthen the protection of British citizens: by introducing a Bill in Parliament to enact the safeguards recommended by the Joint Committee on Human Rights in its Fifteenth Report of 2010-12, and by pursuing such amendments to the UK-US Extradition Treaty 2003 and the EU Council Framework Decision 2002 on the European Arrest Warrant as are necessary in order to give effect to such recommendations.
House of Commons Debate on 5th December You can read the report of this debate here.
Update on Babar Ahmad E-Petition
Thanks to the amazing efforts of concerned British individuals of all faiths and political persuasions, the epetition for Babar Ahmad has reached over 140,000 signatories. We are working with Rt Hon Sadiq Khan MP, Babars MP, to try to secure a debate on the petition and extradition matters more generally, in the House of Commons. Dominic Raab MP has already secured a Westminster Hall debate on extradition but we would like to see the debates conjoined but only if it is to be heard on the floor of the House, given the massive public support the issue has once again attracted.
Today the Home Office published the findings of its 3 member review panel
Surprisingly the Review recommends no change to our current extradition legislation. This appears to fly in the face of the detailed report issued earlier this year by the Joint Committee on Human Rights which was adamant in its support for the inclusion of a forum amendment (see http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/jt201012/jtselect/jtrights/156/156.pdf).
We await the Governments response with interest will it choose to support the JCHR position, or that of the 3 member review Panel.
Action or inertia?
To encourage the correct path, please visit our Take Action page and take action!
More than 140,000 people have signed the e-petition urging the UK government to stop the extradition of British detainee Babar Ahmad to the U.S and put him on trial in the U.K instead. It is currently the highest ranked e-petition about a single person.
Supporters of the Free Babar Ahmad campaign have today released a 3 minute song video on You Tube about his case titled 'Life is One Big Road,' encouraging people to sign the e-petition.
They hope to get over 100,000 signatures by 10 November 2011 to force parliament to respond to their demand of putting him on trial in the UK.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lPuHTPVHnQE